Safety and efficiency of discharge to home hospitalization directly after emergency department care of patients with acute heart failure. / Análisis de seguridad y eficiencia de la hospitalización a domicilio directamente desde urgencias en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze whether discharge to home hospitalization (HHosp) directly from emergency departments (EDs) after care for acute heart failure (AHF) is efficient and if there are short-term differences in outcomes between patients in HHosp vs those admitted to a conventional hospital ward (CHosp). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Secondary analysis of cases from the EAHFE registry (Epidemiology of Acute Heart Failure in Emergency Departments). The EAHFE is a multicenter, multipurpose, analytical, noninterventionist registry of consecutive AHF patients after treatment in EDs. Cases were included retrospectively and registered to facilitate prospective follow-up. Included were all patients diagnosed with AHF and discharged to HHosp from 2 EDs between March 2016 and February 2019 (3 years). Cases from 6 months were analyzed in 3 periods: March-April 2016 (corresponding to EAHFE-5), January-February 2018 (EAHFE-6), and January-February 2019 (EAHFE-7). The findings were adjusted for characteristics at baseline and during the AHF decompensation episode. RESULTS: A total of 370 patients were discharged to HHosp and 646 to CHosp. Patients in the HHosp group were older and had more comorbidities and worse baseline functional status. However, the decompensation episode was less severe, triggered more often by anemia and less often by a hypertensive crisis or acute coronary syndrome. The HHosp patients were in care longer (median [interquartile range], 9 [7-14] days vs 7 [5-11] days for CHosp patients, P .001), but there were no differences in mortality during hospital care (7.0% vs. 8.0%, P = .56), 30-day adverse events after discharge from the ED (30.9% vs. 32.9%, P = .31), or 1-year mortality (41.6% vs. 41.4%, P = .84). Risks associated with HHosp care did not differ from those of CHosp. The odds ratios (ORs) for HHosp care were as follows for mortality while in care, OR 0.90 (95% CI, 0.41-1.97); adverse events within 30 days of ED discharge, OR 0.88 (95% CI, 0.62-1.26); and 1-year mortality, OR 1.03 (95% CI, 0.76-1.39). Direct costs of HHosp and CHosp averaged €1309 and €5433, respectively. CONCLUSION: After ED treatment of AHF, discharge to HHosp requires longer care than CHosp, but short- and longterm outcomes are the same and at a lower cost.

OBJETIVO: Analizar si la hospitalización domiciliaria (HDom) directamente desde los servicios de urgencias (SU) de pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) resulta eficiente y si se asocia con diferencias en evolución a corto y largo plazo comparada con hospitalización convencional (HCon). METODO: Análisis secundario del registro Epidemiology Acute Heart Failure in Emergency departments (EAHFE), que es un registro multicéntrico, multiporpósito, analítico no intervencionista, con seguimiento prospectivo que incluye de forma consecutiva a los pacientes que acuden por episodio de ICA al SU. Se incluyeron, retrospectivamente, todos los pacientes diagnosticados de ICA en dos SU ingresados directamente en HDom entre marzo de 2016 y febrero de 2019 (3 años) y se compararon sus resultados con los pacientes diagnosticados de ICA incluidos en el registro EAHFE por esos 2 SU e ingresados en HCon durante los periodos marzo-abril 2016 (EAHFE-5), enero-febrero 2018 (EAHFE-6), y enero-febrero 2019 (EAHFE-7) (6 meses). Los resultados se ajustaron por las características basales y clínicas del episodio de descompensación. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 370 pacientes en HDom y 646 en HCon. El grupo HDom tenía mayor edad, mayor comorbilidad y peor situación funcional basal, pero menor gravedad del episodio de descompensación, más frecuentemente desencadenado por anemia y menos por crisis hipertensiva y síndrome coronario agudo. La duración del ingreso fue mayor [mediana (RIC) 9 (7-14) días frente a 7 (5-11) días, p 0,001], pero no hubo diferencias en mortalidad intrahospitalaria (7,0% frente a 8,0%, p = 0,56), eventos adversos a 30 días posalta (30,9% frente a 32,9%, p = 0,31) ni mortalidad al año (41,6% frente a 41,4%, p = 0,84). En el modelo ajustado, el riesgo asociado a HDom tampoco difirió significativamente en mortalidad intrahospitalaria (OR = 0,90, IC 95% = 0,41-1,97), eventos adversos posalta a 30m días (HR = 0,88, IC95% = 0,62-1,26) ni mortalidad al año (HR = 1,03, IC 95% = 0,76-1,39). El coste directo promedio del episodio en HDom y HCon fue 1.309 y 5.433 euros, respectivamente. CONCLUSIONES: En la ICA, la HDom directamente desde el SU es más prolongada que la HCon, pero consigue los mismos resultados a corto y largo plazo, y su coste es inferior.

Análisis de seguridad y eficiencia de la hospitalización a domicilio directamente desde urgencias en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda / Safety and efficiency of discharge to home hospitalization directly after emergency department care of patients with acute heart failure

Objetivos: Analizar si la hospitalización domiciliaria (HDom) directamente desde los servicios de urgencias (SU) de pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) resulta eficiente y si se asocia con diferencias en evolución a corto y largo plazo comparada con hospitalización convencional (HCon). Método: Análisis secundario del registro Epidemiology Acute Heart Failure in Emergency departments (EAHFE), que es un registro multicéntrico, multiporpósito, analítico no intervencionista, con seguimiento prospectivo que incluye de forma consecutiva a los pacientes que acuden por episodio de ICA al SU. Se incluyeron, retrospectivamente, todos los pacientes diagnosticados de ICA en dos SU ingresados directamente en HDom entre marzo de 2016 y febrero de 2019 (3 años) y se compararon sus resultados con los pacientes diagnosticados de ICA incluidos en el registro EAHFE por esos 2 SU e ingresados en HCon durante los periodos marzo-abril 2016 (EAHFE-5), enero-febrero 2018 (EAHFE-6), y enero-febrero 2019 (EAHFE-7) (6 meses). Los resultados se ajustaron por las características basales y clínicas del episodio de descompensación. Resultados: Se incluyeron 370 pacientes en HDom y 646 en HCon. El grupo HDom tenía mayor edad, mayor comorbilidad y peor situación funcional basal, pero menor gravedad del episodio de descompensación, más frecuentemente desencadenado por anemia y menos por crisis hipertensiva y síndrome coronario agudo. La duración del ingreso fue mayor [mediana (RIC) 9 (7-14) días frente a 7 (5-11) días, p < 0,001], pero no hubo diferencias en mortalidad intrahospitalaria (7,0% frente a 8,0%, p = 0,56), eventos adversos a 30 días posalta (30,9% frente a 32,9%, p = 0,31) ni mortalidad al año (41,6% frente a 41,4%, p = 0,84). (AU)

Objectives: To analyze whether discharge to home hospitalization (HHosp) directly from emergency departments (EDs) after care for acute heart failure (AHF) is efficient and if there are short-term differences in outcomes between patients in HHosp vs those admitted to a conventional hospital ward (CHosp). Methods: Secondary analysis of cases from the EAHFE registry (Epidemiology of Acute Heart Failure in Emergency Departments). The EAHFE is a multicenter, multipurpose, analytical, noninterventionist registry of consecutive AHF patients after treatment in EDs. Cases were included retrospectively and registered to facilitate prospective follow-up. Included were all patients diagnosed with AHF and discharged to HHosp from 2 EDs between March 2016 and February 2019 (3 years). Cases from 6 months were analyzed in 3 periods: March-April 2016 (corresponding to EAHFE-5), January-February 2018 (EAHFE-6), and January-February 2019 (EAHFE-7). The findings were adjusted for characteristics at baseline and during the AHF decompensation episode. Results: A total of 370 patients were discharged to HHosp and 646 to CHosp. Patients in the HHosp group were older and had more comorbidities and worse baseline functional status. However, the decompensation episode was less severe, triggered more often by anemia and less often by a hypertensive crisis or acute coronary syndrome. The HHosp patients were in care longer (median [interquartile range], 9 [7-14] days vs 7 [5-11] days for CHosp patients, P < .001), but there were no differences in mortality during hospital care (7.0% vs. 8.0%, P = .56), 30-day adverse events after discharge from the ED (30.9% vs. 32.9%, P = .31), or 1-year mortality (41.6% vs. 41.4%, P = .84). (AU)

Evaluation of the HEFESTOS scale to predict outcomes in emergency department acute heart failure patients.

The HEFESTOS scale was developed in 14 Spanish primary care centres and validated in 9 primary care centres of other European countries. It showed good performance to predict death/hospitalisation during the first 30 days after an episode of acute heart failure (AHF), with c-statistics of 0.807/0.730 in the derivation/validation cohorts. We evaluated this scale in the emergency department (ED) setting, comparing it to the EHMRG and MEESSI scales in the ED and the EFFECT and GWTG scales in hospitalised patients, to predict 30-day outcomes, including death and hospitalisation. Consecutive AHF patients were enrolled in 34 Spanish EDs in January-February 2016, 2018, and 2019 with variables needed to calculate outcome scores. Thirty-day hospitalisation/death (together and separately) and post-discharge combined adverse event (ED revisit or hospitalisation for AHF or all-cause death) were determined for patients discharged home after ED care. Predictive capacity was assessed by c-statistic with 95% confidence intervals. Of 10,869 patients, 4,044 were included (median age: 83 years, 54% women). The performance of HEFESTOS was modest for 30-day hospitalisation/death, c-statistic=0.656 (0.637-0.675), hospitalisation, 0.650 (0.631-0.669), and death, 0.610 (0.576-0.644). Of 1,034 patients with scores for the 5 scales, HEFESTOS had the numerically highest c-statistic for hospitalisation/death at 30 days, 0.666 (0.627-0.704), vs. MEESSI= 0.650 (0.612-0.687, p=0.51), EFFECT=0.633 (0.595-0.672, p=0.21), GWTG=0.618 (0.578-0.657, p=0.06) and EHMRG=0.617 (0.577-0.704, p=0.07). Similar modest performances were observed for predicting hospitalisation [ranging from HEFESTOS=0.656 (0.618-0.695) to GWTG=0.603 (0.564-0.643)]. Conversely, prediction of 30-day death was good with the MEESSI=0.787 (0.728-845), EFFECT=0.754 (0.691-0.818) and GWTG=0.749 (0.689-0.809) scales, and modest with EHMRG=0.649 (0.581-0.717) and HEFESTOS=0.610 (0.538-0.683). Although the HEFESTOS scale was numerically better for predicting 30-day hospitalisation/death in ED AHF patients, its modest performance precludes routine use. Only 30-day mortality was adequately predicted by some scales, with the MEESSI achieving the best results.